From cyanide at worldforge.org Wed Dec 13 17:33:39 2000 From: cyanide at worldforge.org (Oliver White) Date: Sat Apr 5 19:46:39 2003 Subject: [WF-Scripting] Rules implementation Message-ID: <3A37B2F3.E7102C9F@worldforge.org> Which is the appropriate list for discussing rules implementation with stage? I suppose we should keep the discussion on server@ for now, whilst the infrastructure is put in place, but I think in the not-to-distant future I'd like to work with 3rd parties to help develop rules modules. Will scripters@ ever have life breathed into it? -- Oliver White - New email address: cyanide@worldforge.org Developer for WorldForge: http://www.worldforge.org From bryce at neptune.net Wed Dec 13 10:46:56 2000 From: bryce at neptune.net (Bryce Harrington) Date: Sat Apr 5 19:46:39 2003 Subject: [WF-Scripting] Rules implementation In-Reply-To: <3A37B2F3.E7102C9F@worldforge.org> Message-ID: use rules@? On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Oliver White wrote: > Which is the appropriate list for discussing rules implementation with > stage? I suppose we should keep the discussion on server@ for now, > whilst the infrastructure is put in place, but I think in the > not-to-distant future I'd like to work with 3rd parties to help develop > rules modules. > > Will scripters@ ever have life breathed into it? > > -- > Oliver White - New email address: cyanide@worldforge.org > Developer for WorldForge: http://www.worldforge.org > > _______________________________________________ > Scripting mailing list > Scripting@mail.worldforge.org > http://mail.worldforge.org/lists/listinfo/scripting > -- Bryce Harrington bryce @ neptune.net